- Insurance Newslink Global Trends-Editor's Weekly Overview
- Lloyd's publishes its new Culture Dashboard
- CII urges action to restore trust
- Swiss Re confirms claims and reserves related to COVID-19 of $2.5bn-resulted in a net loss of $1.1bn but confident for the future
- Hastings Insurance Group confirmed that it has been approached regarding a possible cash offer
- US P&C surplus fell by $75.7bn in first quarter
- RMS estimates that US insured losses from Hurricane Hanna will not exceed $400m expired
- Sapiens to acquire Boston--based Delphi Technology expired
- Chubb reports net loss for second quarter of $331m expired
- RSA operating and underwriting results up for first half expired
- AXIS Capital reports net income of $112 m for second quarter expired
- Lancashire produced strong underwriting performance in first half expired
29th July 2020
Insurance Europe warns EC against its proposals to introduce a new definition of “sustainability preferences” across the delegated acts of MiFID II, the Insurance Distribution Directive (IDD) and Solvency II
A group of financial sector associations–including Insurance Europe–has written to the European Commission to warn against its proposals to introduce a new definition of “sustainability preferences” across the delegated acts of MiFID II, the Insurance Distribution Directive (IDD) and Solvency II.
While supporting the Commission’s aim of creating a strong framework for investment that supports the transition to sustainability, insurers have serious concerns that these proposals, as currently drafted, will, in fact, restrict customers’ access to sustainable finance by unduly limiting the range of products that insurers are able to offer them.
The issue is that, while the Commission’s proposal for the definition of sustainability preferences is based on the product categories under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), it adds extra criteria–regarding adverse impacts and sustainable investment criteria–for products that promote sustainable characteristics, but that do not necessarily have a sustainability objective.
This would result in a group of sustainable products that would comply with the stringent requirements of the SFDR, but that cannot be offered to a customer who expresses a desire for a sustainable product due to the additional criteria the Commission is proposing.
Therefore, these newly proposed requirements on eligible products are inconsistent with the SFDR’s objectives and should be removed. Otherwise, they would hamper the ability of the financial sector to offer products that support and accelerate the transition to a more sustainable economy.
Insurance Europe Trends(236 articles)
Solvency II Trends(1,741 mentions in Insurance Newslink)