- Swiss Re new sigma report looks at the potential of advanced analytics
- Hamilton completes acquisition of Pembroke Managing Agency and its platform at Lloyd’s, as well as Dublin-based carrier, Ironshore Europe DAC(IEDAC), from Liberty Mutual
- Insurance Europe publishes response to a consultation by the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) on systemic risk
- S&P Global reviews Californian wildfires and re/insurers risk appetite
- Majesco publishes new thought leadership report headed "The Future of Insurance: Optimization, Growth and Innovation"
- WIllis Towers Watson Claim Metrics benchmarking analysis indicates that motor claims payout inflation in the UK rose by 8.6% in 2018
- Global Risk Partners(GRP) moves for Health and Safety Click(H&S Click). expired
- Illinois-based Pekin Insurance has successfully deployed Guidewire InsurancePlatform expired
- High Court declines to sanction the transfer of an annuity portfolio from Prudential to Rothesay Life expired
- Lloyd's broker SSL Endeavour announces senior appointments-to acquire aviation broker/MGA in North America expired
- DARAG appoints Insley as CFO expired
- Everest Insurance appoints Adams to head operations in Bermuda expired
11th August 2019
S&P Global reviews reinsurance market trends
The magnitude of the 2018 natural catastrophes losses-about 50% higher than reinsurers would expect in an average year-helped push up prices at the 2019 April and June/July renewals. Property catastrophe rates increased by 15%-25% on loss-affected accounts. Reinsurers' very strong capital adequacy gives them a cushion against catastrophe risk exposure, despite the recent high insured losses, says S&P Global.
Most of the top-20 reinsurers chose to increase their exposure relative to capital, to benefit from the slightly improved conditions. A few stuck with defensive measures, allowing their exposure to contract further, as they had in 2018. On average, reinsurers' property-catastrophe risk appetite at a 1-in-250-year return period rose to 29% of shareholder equity, but some reinsurers saw reductions of more than five percentage points.
Meanwhile, alternative capital growth seems to have paused, at least temporarily. This did not materially shift reinsurer's retrocession strategies.
Although global reinsurers have maintained their underwriting discipline, the rating agency expects earnings volatility could be higher than historically observed, where exposure has increased. The sector remains resilient to extreme events, but they expect a larger industry loss would hit more reinsurers. If a 1-in-100-year event hits, causing losses well in excess of $200bn across the insurance industry, we expect only 12 of the 20 global reinsurers would maintain their current S&P Global Ratings capital adequacy level, as measured by their model.
S&P Global Trends(502 articles)